Germany's new grid-charge system starts in 2029. Grandfathering out of it does not. Under the draft determination, a project has to reach a final investment decision before the ruling is announced on 1 January 2027 — and the BNetzA's definition of that decision requires committed capital, not intent.
If you operate a commercial or industrial site with on-site generation, a battery, or both, AgNes changes what you pay to be connected to the German grid — not what you pay for power. That distinction is why it has been under-read, and why the deadline attached to it has been missed.
AgNes is the Bundesnetzagentur's determination proceeding on the design of electricity grid charges. It replaces the StromNEV framework, which expires on 31 December 2028, with a new system effective 1 January 2029.
It is not a solar rule or a battery rule. It is the tariff architecture deciding how the cost of the grid is split, and it reaches consumers, generation plants, storage and electrolysers at once. What is new is that generation and storage start paying a capacity charge at all — historically they have not.
| Who | What changes | From |
|---|---|---|
| Generation above 30 kW solar PV, wind, biogas, CHP | Pays a capacity charge. Indicated at €4–7/kW/year; the regulator's own worked example lands at €5.38–5.65/kW/year on a rolling five-year average. | 2029 |
| Battery storage | Same capacity charge basis as generation. Crucially, still no work-related charge on electricity charged or discharged — the double-charging problem is addressed. | 2029 |
| Residential storage | Exempt up to 30 kW connection capacity in low voltage. | — |
| Consumers over 100,000 kWh/yr | Capacity-based pricing — a demand charge, with penalties for exceeding booked capacity. | 2029 |
| Prosumers | Base price (Grundpreis) rises by an indicated 70–90%. | 2029 |
| Bandload customers (§19(2) s.2 StromNEV) | Existing arrangements protected — the longest transitional runway in the draft. | Until 31.12.2031 |
For batteries specifically, the draft has been read by market analysts as close to a best case: the capacity charge is real, but it is roughly a tenth of what household customers pay on the same basis, and the absence of energy-based charges on throughput is the point storage operators had been lobbying hardest for.
Transitional protection does not turn on when your project is finished. It turns on when it is committed.
Protection, once secured, runs for 20 years from commissioning.
This is the part that turns a regulatory deadline into a financing one. Under the draft, FID means:
Take a mid-sized C&I site: 260 kW of rooftop PV alongside a 200 kW battery — 460 kW of chargeable capacity.
Fifty thousand euro on a site of that size is not ruinous. It is, however, a cost that appears in no model written before 2026, lands in the years the debt is still outstanding, and is avoidable at zero cost by bringing a decision forward by a few months. That asymmetry is the whole argument.
Scale it and it stops being marginal. The same arithmetic on a 5 MW site is roughly €27,000 a year and over half a million euro across twenty years.
Because the question AgNes puts to a C&I operator is one we answer for a living: can this project reach a committed investment decision inside a fixed window, on terms that survive the regime it is being decided under?
AgNes remains a draft determination. Dates, thresholds and charge levels here are drawn from the BNetzA's published orientation points and full Festlegungsentwurf and from legal commentary on them, and have already changed once during consultation — the FID deadline was undated in earlier drafts and was pinned only when the full draft was published. One further point deserves care: the storage-specific provisions are explicitly about storage, while solar PV is caught by the generation capacity charge above 30 kW, and not all commentators describe the two the same way. Confirm your own position with counsel before acting. This note is market commentary, not legal, regulatory, tax or investment advice.
No engagement letter, no retainer, no discovery call. Send the essentials and we come back with a view — while there is still time to act on it.
Email deals@aip-partners.com with:
Within two working days you get a written view from a partner: whether the site looks likely to fall inside or outside transitional protection, what the capacity charge does to the case in euro, and — where it is relevant — what a financing timetable to a defensible FID before 31 December 2026 would have to look like. If the answer is that you do not need us, we will say so in the same email.
Munich and London. Success-fee only, since 2010. Response within two working days.